"Dependency is death to initiative, to risk-taking and opportunity. It is time to stop the spread of government dependency and fight it like the poison it is."
Everyday people in our society depends on government assistance to the point it has become a demanding need. Their head has been poisoned to think they don't need to get up and make a living for themselves. Tax-payers money have found an easy resort in their hands. As a working tax-payer, it's aggravating to know that your hard earned money is going to people who just sits on their behind and enjoy the easy access to money. Don't give me wrong, there are people that are working and receiving the government assistance because it is hard to make ends reach. I understand their argument, but what is the argument for those that just 'sit-back-relax' and in it just for the money?
For instance, one customer placed a crib, stroller, and mattress on layaway. She came back a week later to take out her layaway but ended up voiding the whole transaction, and then insisted on getting a copy of the void so she can send to her social-worker. Sending "proof" ought to show she cannot afford to pay for these kind of necessities, but, yet she managed to be rocking the latest Kilroys', Louis Vuitton bag, and a pair of true religions on her behind. Oh, she's being true to her religion, huh? The perfect and legit example of a loafer, and prime example that their need to be a stop to spread of government dependency.
Everyday people in our society depends on government assistance to the point it has become a demanding need. Their head has been poisoned to think they don't need to get up and make a living for themselves. Tax-payers money have found an easy resort in their hands. As a working tax-payer, it's aggravating to know that your hard earned money is going to people who just sits on their behind and enjoy the easy access to money. Don't give me wrong, there are people that are working and receiving the government assistance because it is hard to make ends reach. I understand their argument, but what is the argument for those that just 'sit-back-relax' and in it just for the money?
For instance, one customer placed a crib, stroller, and mattress on layaway. She came back a week later to take out her layaway but ended up voiding the whole transaction, and then insisted on getting a copy of the void so she can send to her social-worker. Sending "proof" ought to show she cannot afford to pay for these kind of necessities, but, yet she managed to be rocking the latest Kilroys', Louis Vuitton bag, and a pair of true religions on her behind. Oh, she's being true to her religion, huh? The perfect and legit example of a loafer, and prime example that their need to be a stop to spread of government dependency.
No comments:
Post a Comment