Monday, December 14, 2015

White is Beautiful. Black is Beautiful. White Power. Black Power.

Power defined as beautiful. I'm going to say no. Power and beauty correlate for a second but it's fleeting. Power is the reason there is a difference between black and white. Someone in power said we're different. We is not them. Power is hideous. But powerlessness is horrible too. It's a paradox. Power means you have control. That you have authority but over what? When power is said no one means power over the self. That's freedom. Power by itself means control over others. If someone is powerful that automatically translates to someone is being forced to be weaker. Is that beauty? White and black shouldn't be used that way. White and black have been used in multiple kinds of context. Color, race, but my favorite is light. White light is created by the mixture of all the color spectrums, think Pink Floyd. Black is the absence of light. In those terms it's simple and logical, but when applied to people it's fatal. If there is black, white cannot exist. If there is white, it's imposed on the black. So what do we do? It's time that we focus less on the extremes and concentrate on the in between. The color.
-Yandely Almonte

Friday, December 4, 2015

11/30/15 Journal Entry on Mark Zuckerberg talking in Chinese - Jasneel Chaddha

By: Jasneel Chaddha
Journal Entry from 11/30/15

China. The world's most prosperous economy right now. Its no surprise that Mark Zuckerberg, a businessman, wants to expand his brand and product in a nation like China. Any smart businessman would do the same thing. The only problem is the severe language barrier. Unlike most countries, China does not require its students to study English. Rather, it is offered as an optional course at schools and universities across the country. Zuckerberg knew that in order to be taken seriously among the other business giants in China, he would need to impress them with more than just his product. He needed to impress them with his knowledge, however limited, of the Chinese language. I think its ironic that Zuckerberg has tried so hard to expand to China when his product, Facebook, is blocked across the entire country. Trust me, I know; I went to China for 3 weeks a few summers ago and was Facebook deprived for the entire duration of the trip. Perhaps he sees a future where it won't be blocked. If that happens, however, it will complicate matters for Facebook; China already has numerous social media sites that have millions of users. It will be tough to convince Chinese cities to switch over to Facebook. But I also respect Mark a lot for taking the initiative to learn Chinese, despite his insanely busy schedule. I know how hard it is to learn Chinese; I took it as my foreign language all through high school, and plan to continue studying it here at NYU. It takes a lot of time to master, and he's already pretty good. It is also validation for me that I understood what he said without the subtitles. I guess I did learn something after four and a half years of taking the language. Remains to be seen if Facebook will ever be unblocked in China, but Zuckerberg sure does have quite a few talents. I guess being married to a Chinese woman left him no choice, right?!

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Malcolm Gladwell picture - Susan Oh

Crazy curly hair, pasty white face, lanky stature.  Who the hell is this guy. He definitely looks like some type of 21st century genius who won a Novel prize for science or something. Since this is a writing class, I bet he's a famous writer or author of a grand masterpiece that I'm yet again unaware of. Sometimes the prompts professor Jackson gives us seriously make me feel like an uncultured lump on a log.  For a split second, I low-key thought it was a picture of an old grandma wearing hip clothes.  Maybe it was a picture of a hip grandma, you know, like Betty White. Speaking of Betty White, I read an article a couple days ago that said she had passed away. Baffled, I googled to see if it were true and it wasn't. How cruel is it to make up a false rumor about someone's death, that's kinda messed up.  Anyway, going back to the picture, now that I think of it, I think it's a picture of Malcolm Gladwell.  It makes sense because we read a piece by him for homework.  Unlike most of the other writers we had read about previously, I had actually heard of Malcolm Gladwell.  I gave my grade 12 English teacher a book called, "David and Goliath" by him.  It was about the underdogs of the world. It seemed like a good read, I hope he didn't already have it.  Professor Jackson just came into the room again with his daily dose of Argo tea.  "Looks like three minutes" he said.  Wow, I've literally filled an entire page on no topic at all but I mean... I'm not even sure if that is Malcolm Gladwell after all.  If it is, then yay, I like him and his works.  If it's not, oh well, at least you know Betty White isn't actually dead. 

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Martin Luther King video clip - Susan

Martin Luther King Junior.  The name is famous amongst history students everywhere. Leader of the black civil rights movement, powerful speaker, compassionate human being.  He gave his infamous "I have a dream" speech which not only touched the hearts of the people who physically saw him standing in D.C, but also continues to touch the hearts of generations long after he's gone. The video showed an unseen clip of Martin Luther King's assassin James Earl Ray and to be frank, I'm not sure why it was such a big deal that they uncovered the clip. Martin Luther King still died, and the world was instantly affected. From what I could tell, there was nothing particularly significant that the world could deduce from the clip itself, but I could be wrong. Going back to MLK, I think one of the main reasons why he rose to such prominence in the black civil rights movement was because he had a way with his words.  There are certain people who are capable of easily captivating an audience with their speech and MLK possessed that special talent; that made him an important activist that many people looked up to. A similar person is Barack Obama.  Obama reminds me a lot of MLK not just in the way he looks, but because of the way they both led their people.  MLK was obviously a leader of a mass group of people and well, Obama led the country.  It is these types of people, the people that are able to enter into peoples' heads and flip on a switch, that end up changing the face of history forever; infinitely living in the minds of humanity. 

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Declaration of Independence from Partisan Politics


Declaration of Independence from Partisan Politics

There are times in the course of history when it is necessary for a group of individuals to divorce themselves from an inherently unjust political system, and today is such a time. For too long have unique ideas been crushed under the oppressive boot of partisan politics. It is our human right to participate in a system that acknowledges the vast variety of opinions held by those in the country in which it exists.

We believe that it is an inalienable human right to live in a nation in which the government accurately depicts the national political dialog. This right is intended to be secured by governments, but it has become all too clear that the current political system that dominates the government of the United States has become too powerful. It is therefore the duty of the people to reject such a system that champions only a fraction of the political spectrum. The history of the political systems of the United States is littered with discarded political parties, and those that currently dominate the political scene ought to join them. The current political system in the United States has stifled the growth of its political dialog. We submit the following facts to a candid world.

They have refused to take a third party seriously, leading to stalemates in Congress.
They have denied American citizens their right to change the governmental structure of our country by preventing other political parties from forming.
They direct billions of dollars in funding towards Democrats and Republicans, putting other parties at an economic disadvantage and severely hindering their chances of victory or influence in the American government.
They have prevented prominent political figures such as Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump from associating with other parties not named “Democratic” or “Republican,” as chances of victory decrease if associated with other parties.
They have prevented compromise from occurring, reducing progress and leaving major issues unresolved.
They have hindered American citizens from having choice during political elections.
They have prevented American citizens from forming opinions that diverge from the ideals of the Democratic and Republican parties.
They have promoted corruption, deadlock, and division in the American governmental system, as the Democratic and Republican parties are not regulated and cannot be held accountable by other political parties.

Our advocacy for more choices other than a mere two party system has been met with either utter neglect or bitter disdain. The freedom and independence of this nation are no longer prevalent in this obstinate political scene. The voices of the minority, which we uphold, are squelched to nonexistence. We are forced to conform to a system which is insufficient in addressing the pressing concerns of all individuals. We have appealed to legal institutions and pleaded for the empowerment of a separate political force, but our demands were not addressed in formal manner nor were they taken in serious consideration.

We, henceforth, rejecters of partisanship, declare our independence from the corrupt conventional political establishment. We hold our rights to form independent political decisions and are no longer bound to the laws and enforcements from the two-party political scene. Members of our following reserve the right to vote and form allegiances with other political groups. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our right for political freedom.

Signed,

Jasneel Chaddha
Jack Clark
Writing I, Section Two (WRI-UF 101.023)

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

James Baldwin

"Sticks and stone my break my bones, but words will never hurt me" is the anthem of children. A protection, a mantra against the ones against them. Taught by teachers trying to prepare those children for not only one or two phrases, but instead a world that does not just say words but instead carves them into our cerebral cortex. Piercing away at ourselves and who we say we are. But while that is all good and noble where is the "You have broken bones so you say words to hurt me" speech? When is it ok to say that the responsibility should not be on the victim? I misspoke those children are not victims, only casualties of an internal war that does not involve them. So do we just give aid to the veterans and ignore their cries of PTSD or do we ask who is the real enemy that caused it in the first place? Is there any way to say to these conditioned children that "The fight exists and you were in the middle of it" without them assigning themselves responsibility? Those who throw words got them from someone else. No one knows how to hurt, it is learned. So how do we stop the process of gaining those weighted words. Maybe it's when we say "Sticks and stones may break my soul, but words will damage the soul". It's when we offer those stones and throw them into the river.
-Yandely A.  

Monday, September 14, 2015

Interpretive and Evaluative Questions - 9/16/15

Jasneel Chaddha
9/16/15
WRI-UF 101.023
Prof. Mitchell Jackson

Interpretive and Evaluative Questions

“Generation Why?”

Interpretive:
1.)      According to Smith’s article, what seems to be the fundamental difference between “People 1.0” and “People 2.0”?

2.)      Why does Smith believe that The Social Network does a poor job of depicting Mark Zuckerberg, or “nerds” in general?

3.)      Smith states a quote from The Social Network: “We lived on farms, then we lived in cities and now we’re gonna live on the internet.” What does this mean?

Evaluative:
1.)      Smith expresses that “we have different ideas about things. Specifically, we have different ideas about what a person is, or should be.” Does social media, like Facebook, cause us to make judgments about peopl? Are these judgments inaccurate or misguided, and do they often lead to discrimination?

2.)      According to Smith, “when a human being becomes a set of data on a website like Facebook, he or she is reduced. Everything shrinks. Individual character. Friendships. Language. Sensibility.” Is social media, or the internet as a whole, causing us to lose our sense of self worth and dignity? Does it contribute to constant self-consciousness?


3.)      Smith states that Facebook does not help to stay in touch with others; if we truly cared about others and wanted to see them or stay in touch, we would find better ways. She says that “what we actually want to do is the bare minimum.” How does this relate to the growing notion that the generation of New Millennials are extremely self-centered?